** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~enr0n/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+git/plymouth/+merge/485641

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
    Milestone: None => ubuntu-25.10

** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
    Milestone: None => ubuntu-25.10

** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109800

Title:
  systemd-fsckd functionality should be in plymouth directly

Status in plymouth package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  When systemd-fsckd was removed from upstream systemd, a small
  helper/compatibility feature was left behind. When systemd-fsck is
  running, it will connect to /run/systemd/fsck.progress, if it exists,
  and point fsck to that fd for progress updates. The systemd-fsckd patch
  in Ubuntu currently utilizes that, and then sends updates to plymouth.
  This means that we currently have a situation like this:

   systemd-fsck@dev1.service -
   ...                        |-> systemd-fsckd.service -> plymouthd
   systemd-fsck@devN.service -

  In other words, systemd-fsckd.service is a middleware. But, plymouthd
  could simply listen on /run/systemd/fsck.progress itself.

  There is already very similar logic for this in Ubuntu's plymouth via
  debian/patches/ubuntu-spinner-fsck.patch. Instead of carrying the
  large systemd-fsckd patch in systemd, we should consolidate the
  functionality into the existing plymouth patches.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/2109800/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to