** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Plucky)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Questing)
   Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: Maxime Bélair (mbelair)
       Status: Fix Released

** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Plucky)
       Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107455

Title:
  segfault of lsblk s390x in containers due to apparmor

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  Confirmed
Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apparmor source package in Plucky:
  In Progress
Status in apparmor source package in Questing:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification:

  [ Impact ]

  lsblk would segfault when run from a confined context due to missing
  permissions on the binary execution path, and the lsblk profile need
  rules to give m+r permissions for the binaries themselves.

  [ Test Plan ]

   * Add the following to a new file and use `apparmor_parser path/to/file` to 
load it as a profile:
   abi <abi/4.0>,
   include <tunables/global>
   profile allow_all {
     allow all,
     priority=1 /** px,
   }
   * Choose a subset of the applications confined by profiles under 
profiles/apparmor.d modified by 
debian/patches/ubuntu/profiles_ensure_access_to_attach_path.patch, and for each 
selected application:
     - Run `aa-exec -p allow_all -- lsblk`
     - Verify that the application does not segfault on launch
     - If application segfaults on launch only when run under confinement, 
check for apparmor="DENIED" log entry denying read or mmap operations on the 
binary path, and report verification test failure

  [ Where problems could occur ]

  The lsblk profile update loosens confinement on a profile. However, if
  a user manually modified the installed profile, then the package
  upgrade would cause conflicts, and rejection of the incoming changes
  (either by hand during an interactive upgrade or automatically during
  an batch unattended upgrade) would result in end users not getting the
  packaged fix.

  [ Other Info ]

  __________

  Hey,
  while debugging bug 2107402 we found that there is more to fix.

  Running lsblk in a container on s390x hits this:

  [12064869.934674] audit: type=1400 audit(1744791155.353:111962):
  apparmor="DENIED" operation="file_mmap" class="file"
  namespace="root//lxd-p_<var-snap-lxd-common-lxd>" profile="lsblk"
  name="/usr/bin/lsblk" pid=3286747 comm="lsblk" requested_mask="rm"
  denied_mask="rm" fsuid=1000000 ouid=1000000

  To the user it just segfaults.

  root@p:~# lsblk
  Segmentation fault

  root@p:~# aa-disable lsblk
  Disabling /usr/bin/lsblk.

  root@p:~# lsblk
  NAME     MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
  loop0      7:0    0  93.8M  1 loop
  loop1      7:1    0    94M  1 l
  ...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2107455/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to