Benchmarks can be found nicely formatted on https://github.com/bdrung/apport/blob/benchmark-databases/Benchmark.md
SQLite is the fastest on a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W and the only contender for fixing this bug. For the different SQLite implementation variants: You can trade creation time with saved disk space. Since I was too curious I spend some nights on rewriting those SQLite benchmarks in Rust (see https://github.com/bdrung/apport-rs). The Rust implementation is obviously faster. Surprisingly the creation time for the different database layouts is nearly the same. So I conclude that increased creation times in Python are caused by the Python code (and not by the more complex SQL statements). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073787 Title: apport-retrace needs more than 1 GB memory (when using sandbox) Status in Apport: Triaged Status in apport package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: The system tests test_retrace_system_sandbox and test_retrace_jammy_sandbox fail on arm64, ppc64el, s390x, because apport-retrace is killed by the OOM killer. Example: autopkgtest kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 3597 (apport- retrace) total-vm:1512420kB, anon-rss:1241460kB, file-rss:2592kB, shmem-rss:0kB, UID:0 pgtables:2554kB oom_score_adj:0 Log: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular- bdrung-apport/oracular/s390x/a/apport/20240722_145904_d3c2f@/log.gz apport-retrace should be able to retrace crashes without needing multiple gigabytes of memory. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/2073787/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
