thank you guys for sharing your tips. https://www.depannage-auto-
dijon.com

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413278

Title:
  stack protector guard value does not lead with a NULL byte

Status in GLibC:
  Fix Released
Status in eglibc package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in glibc package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in eglibc source package in Jaunty:
  Invalid
Status in glibc source package in Jaunty:
  Fix Released
Status in eglibc source package in Karmic:
  Fix Released
Status in glibc source package in Karmic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  IMPACT: stack protections are weakened due to strcpy function being able to 
write the stack guard (since it does not start with a zero byte).
  ADDRESSED: correctly implement leading zero, as done in Karmic.
  DISCUSSION: regression potential is low, since the patch is isolated and well 
tested.

  TEST CASE:
  $ bzr branch lp:~ubuntu-bugcontrol/qa-regression-testing/master 
qa-regression-testing
  $ cd qa-regression-testing/scripts
  $ ./test-glibc-security.py -v
  Build helper tools ... (9.10) ok
  glibc heap protection ... ok
  sprintf not pre-truncated with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 ... ok
  glibc pointer obfuscation ... ok
  Password hashes ...  (sha512) ok
  Stack guard exists ... ok
  Stack guard leads with zero byte ... FAIL
  Stack guard is randomized ... ok

  ======================================================================
  FAIL: Stack guard leads with zero byte
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "./test-glibc-security.py", line 170, in test_81_stack_guard_leads_zero
      self.assertEqual(one.startswith('00 '), expected, one)
  AssertionError: 62 55 59 69 cd 20 39 80 

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Ran 8 tests in 0.145s

  FAILED (failures=1)

  expected outcome: 0 failures.

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Aug 13 13:59:02 2009
  Dependencies:
   findutils 4.4.2-1
   gcc-4.4-base 4.4.1-1ubuntu3
   libc6 2.10.1-0ubuntu6
   libgcc1 1:4.4.1-1ubuntu3
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
  Package: libc6 2.10.1-0ubuntu6
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-5.24-generic
  SourcePackage: eglibc
  Uname: Linux 2.6.31-5-generic x86_64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/413278/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to