Note that there were some I think somewhat valid privacy concerns to exposing the service name.
Maybe it's enough to know if apt ran as part of a systemd service, but not which service, or we build a whitelist of services (or check if they are inside /lib/systemd/system - so we do not send local service names). Currently we do have a blacklist that matches user@ services. Another approach was to send whether a tty is attached, but I believe that's a bit less useful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825000 Title: Add ability for mirrors to distinguish interactive and non-interactive apt runs Status in apt package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in apt source package in Eoan: Triaged Bug description: As part of a larger scale plan to manage traffic to the main archive servers it would be useful if apt could provide a facility for us to identify interactive vs. non-interactive traffic on the server side, ideally via a header of some kind. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1825000/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
