So, in addition to the contact: field on all seeded snaps / canonical snaps.
Re: installers We generally do have special cases in ubuntu-bug for "debian-installer", "ubiquity", and "subiquity", as anybody should be able file bug reports against "installation". Whether or not, they are installing or completed the install. That needs more special cases in apport. For snaps that don't declare contact.... Maybe we should direct people at the snapstore URL to try to find who published the package there? Or like direct them at "snaps-on-ubuntu" project that has lots of bugs against any snap out there? I wonder how other distributions handle the "where to file bugs against snaps on $DISTRO". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082 Title: ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps Status in Snapcraft: New Status in snapd: Triaged Status in Snap Store: New Status in apport package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Hello, I had problems with subiquity in the focal live server install image. I tried to use 'ubuntu-bug subiquity' to report the bug, but ubuntu-bug apparently cannot file bug reports against snaps. This is frustrating that users need to know which portions of Ubuntu are delivered via debs, which portions are delivered by snaps, and try to find a way to report bugs correctly. ubuntu-bug should know how to report bugs for Canonical software. Thanks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapcraft/+bug/1861082/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
