Well, ok, here is the real data: my hostname is "fpc" and really has
IPv4 10.2.2.1, the next upstream nameserver is another machine in my
home network, 10.2.2.3 which is configured to also use its /etc/hosts
(so I only need to maintain it on one machine).  Doing the nslookup
directly on 10.2.2.3 ONLY gives the ipv4 address (as I had already
checked before opening this ticket, and which also made me very positive
that the local resolver was to blame).

Unfortunately, the log doesn't really show much about where it gets what
data from...

Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Got DNS stub UDP query packet for 
id 24958
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Looking up RR for fpc IN A.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Sending response packet with id 
24958 on interface 1/AF_INET.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Processing query...
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Got DNS stub UDP query packet for 
id 63588
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Looking up RR for fpc IN AAAA.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Sending response packet with id 
63588 on interface 1/AF_INET.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Processing query...
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Got DNS stub UDP query packet for 
id 13823
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Looking up RR for fpc IN MX.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Cache miss for fpc IN MX
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Transaction 22387 for <fpc IN MX> 
scope dns on */*.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Using feature level UDP for 
transaction 22387.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Using DNS server 10.2.2.3 for 
transaction 22387.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Sending query packet with id 22387.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Processing query...
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Processing incoming packet on 
transaction 22387. (rcode=SUCCESS)
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Not caching negative entry without 
a SOA record: fpc IN MX
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Transaction 22387 for <fpc IN MX> 
on scope dns on */* now complete with <success> from network (unsigned).
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Sending response packet with id 
13823 on interface 1/AF_INET.
Dez 06 09:02:14 fpc systemd-resolved[25637]: Freeing transaction 22387.

At that minute&second I did a "host fpc". The log entries before and
after had sufficiently separate timings. (I repeated it a few times,
until other requests from other applications didn't mix in.)

This is what I get from asking "upstream" DNS directly:
$ nslookup fpc 10.2.2.3
Server:         10.2.2.3
Address:        10.2.2.3#53

Name:   fpc
Address: 10.2.2.1

$
That machine 10.2.2.3 is still running Ubuntu 16.04 and dnsmasq.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853669

Title:
  systemd resolves own hostname to link local ipv6 address

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I've got an ethernet-device that only has a configured ipv4 address,
  and some auto-generated link-local (aka "scope link") ipv6 address.

  Any tool doing a DNS query (and /lib/systemd/systemd-resolved is the
  DNS-server listening on 127.0.0.53) for this host's hostname gets back
  two addresses: the correct ipv4 address, and a broken ipv6 address.

  Unlike on ipv4,  it is possible for the same ipv6-address to be
  assigned to multiple devices, and therefore the address is only valid
  in the context of the eth-device.

  Now, if "ifconfig" shows "inet6 fe80::4687:fcff:fe9e:4ac7  prefixlen 64  
scopeid 0x20<link>"
  then "fe80::4687:fcff:fe9e:4ac7" is NOT a connectable address, and syscall 
connect() typically fails with EINVAL.

  To make it a valid address, it needs to be suffixed with a "%" and the device 
name, like:
  fe80::4687:fcff:fe9e:4ac7%enp4s0

  Either the resolver can return the link name attached to the address
  separated with a "%" char, or it needs to ignore link-local inet6
  addresses.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1853669/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to