Hello Julian, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.0.1ubuntu2.21 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-trusty to verification-done-trusty. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-trusty. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814727 Title: Backport never pinning and Packages-Require-Authorization Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] These are not driven from a direct user experience, but are related to other developments: (1) unattended-upgrades could use the never pinning to disable repositories rather than switching candidates. That would simplify code quite a bit. (2) Packages-Require-Authorization lets a repository declare that downloading packages from it requires authorization. This is useful both for private repositories, as it can prevent unattended-upgrades failures if you remove authorization info; and it also allows creating a new form of semi-private repository, where only pool/ requires authorization. [Test case] Tests are included in autopkgtests and cover the common scenarios https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/blob/master/test/integration/test-packages-require-authorization: (1) Add repository with Packages-Require-Authorization and no auth.conf entry: pin -32768 (2) Add repository with Packages-Require-Authorization and a auth.conf entry: pin 500 (3) As (2), but a custom pin still applies https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/blob/master/test/integration/test-policy-pinning#L365 (1) Test that Pin-Priority: never overrides both per-package pins and per-repository pins (2) Test that Pin-Priority: never is only applied for per-repository (Package: *) pins Tests in older releases should be the same, but it's not clear yet. Bug will be updated once the SRUs are ready. [Regression potential] The changes might introduce regressions in pinning. The pinning implementation in trusty is substantially different from the other releases, and should thus require more testing. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1814727/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
