This bug was fixed in the package gcc-8-cross - 18ubuntu0.1
---------------
gcc-8-cross (18ubuntu0.1) bionic-proposed; urgency=medium
* SRU: LP: #1769657. Build using gcc 8.2.0-1ubuntu2
* Build armel, armhf and arm64 cross packages on ppc64el.
gcc-8-cross (18ubuntu3) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.2.0-1ubuntu2.
gcc-8-cross (18ubuntu2) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-11ubuntu1.
gcc-8-cross (18ubuntu1) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-5ubuntu1.
gcc-8-cross (18) unstable; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-5.
gcc-8-cross (17ubuntu1) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-4ubuntu1.
gcc-8-cross (17) unstable; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-4.
gcc-8-cross (16ubuntu2) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Make the control file generation independent of the build
architecture.
gcc-8-cross (16ubuntu1) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-3ubuntu2.
gcc-8-cross (16) unstable; urgency=medium
* gnat-*: Don't search the target dirs when calling dh_shlibdeps.
gcc-8-cross (15ubuntu1) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-3ubuntu1.
gcc-8-cross (14) unstable; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-3.
* Don't build the architecture dependent packages for the native
architecture when building with -B. Closes: #898374.
gcc-8-cross (12ubuntu1) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-1ubuntu2.
gcc-8-cross (12) unstable; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8.1.0-1.
gcc-8-cross (11) unstable; urgency=medium
* Build using gcc 8-20180425-1.
gcc-8-cross (10) unstable; urgency=medium
* Hard-code the cross version.
-- Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> Sun, 29 Jul 2018 01:32:20 +0200
** Changed in: gcc-8 (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769657
Title:
update toolchain packages for bionic
Status in binutils package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in build-essential package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in cross-toolchain-base package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in cross-toolchain-base-ports package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in gcc-7 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in gcc-7-cross package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in gcc-7-cross-ports package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in gcc-8 package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in gcc-8-cross package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in gcc-8-cross-ports package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in gcc-defaults package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in gcc-defaults-ports package in Ubuntu:
New
Status in binutils source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in cross-toolchain-base source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in cross-toolchain-base-ports source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in gcc-7 source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in gcc-7-cross source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in gcc-7-cross-ports source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in gcc-8 source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in gcc-8-cross source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in gcc-8-cross-ports source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in gcc-defaults source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in gcc-defaults-ports source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Bug description:
I'd like to update the toolchain packages in bionic, to state which we
have in cosmic on May 07:
- LP: #1771635: binutils updates from the branch
- gcc-8, update to the final 8.1.0 release
- gcc-7, updates to the gcc-7-branch up to the time of the
8.1.0 release.
- gcc-defaults to bump the 8.1 version, and add some provides
- build-essential to add cross packages for amd64 and i386
- corresponding gcc-cross packages
The package builds are prepared in
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages
[Impact]
Provide an upstream release for GCC 8, and update GCC 7 fixes to the
date of the corresponding GCC 8 updates.
[Regression Potential]
There is regression potential, however with a test rebuild of the main
portion of the archive no regressions were found.
[Test Case]
No regressions in the GCC test suite, and no regressions in the test
rebuild of the main component of the archive (all architectures)
As a test, a complete archive rebuild (main only) was performed, and
no regressions were found with this new package. The archive rebuild
also contained updated versions of gcc-7, gcc-8, binutils, python3.6
and python3.7. The GCC and Python packages should not infer with each
other.
[Validation]
Analyze the build logs for regressions.
For the cross builds, just make sure that the packages build using
the updated sources.
Summary of the test rebuilds:
file:///home/ubuntu/ftbfs-report/production/test-rebuild-20180730-bionic.html
http://people.canonical.com/~doko/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20180730-gcc-bionic.html
No regressions are shown with the test rebuild.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1769657/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
