This bug was fixed in the package e2fsprogs - 1.44.0-1

---------------
e2fsprogs (1.44.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release
  * Update Czech, Spanish, French, Malay, and Ukrainian translations.

 -- Theodore Y. Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>  Wed, 07 Mar 2018 14:39:52 -0500

e2fsprogs (1.44.0~rc2-1) experimental; urgency=medium

  * New upstream release
  * Fix FTBFS problem on Hurd
  * Improved e2fsck's consistency checking for symlink.

 -- Theodore Y. Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>  Sun, 04 Mar 2018 15:57:21 -0500

e2fsprogs (1.44.0~rc1-1) experimental; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * Add support for the large_dir feature
  * Add support for the ea_data feature
  * Resize2fs will not complain about online resizes of bigalloc file
    systems
  * Debugfs's ls command will now print the high bits of the mode bits
  * Fix some corner cases with tune2fs and journal replay
  * Add support for libreadline.so.7
  * E2freefrag will now use the GETFSMAP ioctl for mounted file systems
  * E2fsck is now much faster when scanning extents on bigalloc file systems
  * Fix various compiler and UBSAN warnings

 -- Theodore Y. Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu>  Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:56:32 -0500

** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
       Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756177

Title:
  FFe: e2fsprogs 1.44, support for largedir and ea_inode

Status in e2fsprogs package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  e2fsprogs 1.44 landed in Debian unstable on March 8, missing feature
  freeze / Debian import freeze by about a week.  Per upstream
  
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1365874/comments/17),
  1.44 includes two new not-enabled-by-default features which would be
  good to have available in the 18.04 userspace: largedir, and ea_inode.

  This is a rather stable and well-maintained codebase with stable
  interfaces, so I believe the risks are small to taking this post-FF.
  The one known change in behavior relative to Ubuntu 16.04 is the
  enablement of metadata checksums by default, which is a change we
  already have via the 1.43.9 package, so shouldn't count against an
  FFe.

  The main (but still small) risk to the release from taking this change
  would be disruption to image builds / installation as a result of
  broken tools.  This would be detected fairly quickly through our
  automated image testing, and if any regressions are introduced we
  should roll back the e2fsprogs update immediately.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1756177/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to     : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to