>From a packaging/maintaining side, I agree that zeromq3 looks fine
besides the tests.
In particular, we should absolutely not run the test suite with the '-'
in front of it in debian/rules which ignores the return value. In the
worst case, failing tests should be skipped (but that's still bad!).
But we definitely shouldn't throw out the good tests with the bad ones,
if we can help it.
I'm separately also curious about fixing the tests that are failing
currently.
** Changed in: zeromq3 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zeromq3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597439
Title:
[MIR] zeromq3
Status in zeromq3 package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug description:
Trying to get unity8 in main this cycle, that's one of the depends of
unity-scopes-api (MIR to come)
* availability
it's available/built on all the ubuntu architectures,
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zeromq3/4.1.4-7
* security
the trusty version has some open CVEs which seem to have been resolved in the
newer versions/series of Ubuntu
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/zeromq3.html
* quality
- the package is well maintained in Debian
- it works out of the box with no configuration required
- it has a testsuite which is used during build but currently has some errors
and doesn't stop the build
* dependencies
requires libsodium which is universe
* standards compliance
FHS and Debian Policy compliant.
* ubuntu maintainance
the desktop team is going to look after it, desktop-bugs has been subscribed
* background
no specific info
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zeromq3/+bug/1597439/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
