So... qdjango is a database and a http server rolled into one source. Is there a reason that database was chosen? Seems like a curiously web- centric choice.
We could promote only the database side of things. But just checking if there isn't a more suitable library to use. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qdjango in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1612270 Title: [MIR] qdjango Status in qdjango package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: [Availability] * Available in universe [Rationale] * This package is required by unity8 infographics [Security] * No known security issues at this time. [Quality assurance] * This package has unit tests. [Dependencies] All dependencies are already in main [Standards compliance] * This package uses qmake and does not require translations. [Maintenance] * This package is maintained by Jeremy Laine, upstream in Debian and actively in use on the phone images. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qdjango/+bug/1612270/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
