Ick, I'd forgotten about this (again!) and I won't have time to work on this in the next couple of weeks.
You can't really re-use my merge request: it was rejected, and you can't upload to my branch (which the merge request was for). You can send a new merge request, though. https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Review explains how they work. If you want to take this over, it's probably most expedient to start from the current upstream code (branch lp:apport), fix it there, and submit a new merge request. If you want to continue from where I started, I think you can do something like this (note it's been a while since I used these tools): $ bzr branch lp:~marienz/apport/search-for-executable Branched 1623 revisions. $ bzr merge lp:apport Text conflict in apport/ui.py 1 conflicts encountered. Fix the conflict... it looks like the only conflict is a change from sys.argv[1] to self.args[0], but I didn't test the result. $ bzr commit -m 'Merge lp:apport.' Fix my fix :) $ bzr commit -m 'Fixed fix.' $ bzr push lp:~techtonik/apport/search-for-executable ..and submit a new merge request, see https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Review Thanks for looking at this! If you don't get to it before I'm back from my vacation, I'll hopefully (finally) remember to finish up my fix and get it merged... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447751 Title: ubuntu-bug should fall back to using its argument as a command name ("ubuntu-bug ubuntu-bug" should work) Status in “apport” package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Binary package hint: apport ubuntu-bug understands package names and the full path to a program. If the argument I give it is neither but is the name of an executable on $PATH it should do what I mean and use that. It could optionally confirm that with me first ("Did you mean to file a bug on /usr/bin /ubuntu-bug, owned by the apport package?"). The current "Package ubuntu-bug does not exist" message is less useful than this would be. I'll probably see if I can cook up a branch with this behavior later. ProblemType: Bug ApportLog: Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Oct 10 05:21:33 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: apport 1.9.2-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-13.42-generic SourcePackage: apport Uname: Linux 2.6.31-13-generic i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:4298): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:4298): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:4343): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:4349): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (gnome-panel:4342): Gdk-WARNING **: /build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.18.2/gdk/x11/gdkdrawable-x11.c:952 drawable is not a pixmap or window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/447751/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
