** Also affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: canonical-devices-system-image
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Assignee: (unassigned) => Zoltan Balogh (bzoltan)
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image
Milestone: None => 11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485
Title:
[SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
Status in Canonical System Image:
New
Status in Ubuntu UX:
Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM:
New
Bug description:
[Updated description]
Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other
AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to
make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or
colorization.
Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI.
--- UX Solution ---
Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be
changed by the App developer
–––
Desired solution:
Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be
consistent with our disabled states on buttons.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
