I agree and intentionally opened the bug against procps because I was
able convince myself that it was a procps change and not an AppArmor
change.
I don't think this change is a problem and, personally, I like seeing
the confinement mode in the output.
I think we've came to the conclusion that this is fine behavior so I'm
going to mark this bug as invalid since we don't plan on 'fixing'
anything here.
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561330
Title:
ps security data column includes AppArmor confinement mode in 16.04
Status in procps package in Ubuntu:
Won't Fix
Bug description:
In Xenial, running linux 4.4.0-15-generic and procps
2:3.3.10-4ubuntu2, I see that the security data column has changed to
displaying the AppArmor confinement mode:
$ ps wZ $(pidof cups-browsed)
LABEL PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
/usr/sbin/cups-browsed (enforce) 786 ? Ssl 0:00
/usr/sbin/cups-browsed
This is different than what is displayed in 15.10:
$ ps wZ $(pidof cups-browsed)
LABEL PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
/usr/sbin/cups-browsed 548 ? Ssl 0:00
/usr/sbin/cups-browsed
There was a large AppArmor kernel change in Xenial's 4.4.0-15-generic
so to rule that out, I booted into an earlier Xenial kernel and saw
the same issue:
$ uname -a
Linux sec-xenial-i386 4.4.0-7-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Thu Feb 18 20:50:09 UTC
2016 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
$ ps wZ $(pidof cups-browsed)
LABEL PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
/usr/sbin/cups-browsed (enforce) 631 ? Ssl 0:00
/usr/sbin/cups-browsed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1561330/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
