Is there really a major difference that prevents optimizing directories in an online mode while files are possible? Hm, then I have to find another solution (moving the content from an automated script is too unsecure for my purpose).
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1348775 Title: Supporting -D from e2fsck in e4defrag Status in “e2fsprogs” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 14.10 dev with e2fsprogs 1.42.10-1.1ubuntu1 and e2fsck provides the option -D to optimize directories but in my opinion this is an option that would be more suitable in e4defrag (except that e2fsck also supports ext2 and ext3). Maybe e4defrag can support this option too if this action can be performed on a read/write mounted device which would have the advantage that no read- only remounting and a filesystem check is needed for the optimizing process. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1348775/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
