On 08/14/2018 04:48 PM, panoramix.druida wrote: > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > El 14 de agosto de 2018 8:17 PM, Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> escribió: > >> On 08/13/2018 07:52 PM, panoramix.druida wrote: >> >>> Hi, is there a way to measure the level of anonymity on a system? >> >> Sure. There's some literature. Check out >> https://www.freehaven.net/papers.html. > > Thanks, lots of good stuff!!!
Yeah, it's a _great_ resource. >>> Ricochet is way better to protect anonymity. I don’t need a phone number, >>> not even a name, I just use the onion service hostname. With Richochet I am >>> anonymous all the time unless I identify myself. >>> Email may not be as good as Signal for end to end encryption (even with >>> pgp), but it can be way better for anonymity. For instance, this email >>> account was created using Tor in Protonmail, and there are other mail >>> providers that allow me to this. If I always use Protonmail with Tor, it is >>> very hard for Protonmail to learn who am I and where I live, doing that >>> with Signal is harder. However with Ricochet is way easier. >> >> Well, there's a huge metadata issue with email. Using .onion webmail >> mitigates much of it. But everyone needs to watch their OPSEC, to avoid >> deanonymization. >> >> And why do you say that deanonymization is way easier with Ricochet? >> It's all via .onion instances. But I gather that Tor Project no longer >> actively supports the work. > > What I meant is that is easier to stay anonyumouse on a system like Ricochet. OK, got it. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
