On 5/19/16, Joe Btfsplk <joebtfs...@gmx.com> wrote: > bad ideas. It just struck me as odd that this topic was one of very few > when most tor-talk subscribers decided to adhere to communication > silence.
That's potentially inflammatory. I have not chosen to "adhere to communication silence", I just raised some considerations, well, for your consideration. If you have some ideas, legal or technical or otherwise, feel free to kick off a thread. One of the problems here is people expecting other people, that is, someone -other- than themselves, to have specific discussions on particular matters in a particularly public way. You can demand that other people perform to your expectations all you like. But perhaps consider leading by example. And if you have nothing significant to contribute, then perhaps ask if you're just wanting to be entertained? If you have some great legal insight for example, I suggest to you to consider whether to plaster that across a public mailing list, or whether to discretely contact those who can make use of it, potentially to ambush the other side (in this case the FBI/ CIA/ US govt). Because frankly, we "little folk" need every bit of advantage we can possibly get - unless you can personally pony up for some serious dollar$, we certainly don't have money on our side!! -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
