-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just to expand on s7r's number, I just pulled the latest logs from the servers and compiled a quick breakdown of the HTTP codes, bandwidth etc for anyone interested:
HTTP Code: 200 (OK) Bandwidth used (bytes): 690,400,220,422 Hits: 4,784,288 HTTP Code: 206 (Partial Content) Bandwidth used (bytes): 5,202,918 Hits: 64 HTTP Code: 304 (Not Modified) Bandwidth used (bytes): 52,059 Hits: 259 HTTP Code: 404 (Not Found) Bandwidth used (bytes): 266,053 Hits: 611 HTTP Code: 403 (Forbidden) Bandwidth used (bytes): 2,908 Hits: 7 HTTP Code: 408 (Request Timeout) Bandwidth used (bytes): 0 Hits: 5,442 Total bandwidth usage (bytes): 690,405,744,360 (690 GB) Total hits: 4,790,671 Not bad for a few days work guys! T On 08/07/2015 03:00, s7r wrote: > *Numbers look good: Over 4 million hits in 7 days.* > > I want again to use this opportunity to say THANK YOU to everyone > who is contributing and stress testing. 4 million requests tell me > people are putting quite some effort into it. Please continue to > stress test as much as you can in the next days. After I collect > some rendezvous circuit stats also, we will stop the test - don't > want to overkill the network, prefer to leave more bandwidth > capacity for users. > > I was waiting to have some rendezvous circuit statistics as well, > to compare them with the hits on the webserver and have an overview > on the circuits stats and average number of requests per circuit. > Hopefully this will happen in the next days. Since you asked, here > are the exact numbers now. > > The service was started 1st July 2015. Here are the counts today, > 8th July (little over 7 days of uptime): > > Failback instance #1: 956281 Failback instance #2: 732187 Failback > instance #3: 837818 Failback instance #4: 768636 Failback instance > #5: 911546 ============================= TOTAL: 4206468 > > There are no significant warnings or errors - the same instances > are running since service first started, no reboot or application > restart. I am happy with how it works. As you can see we have *over > 4 million hits*. The number of requests per failback instance > confirms the load is fairly spread. > > Hidden service http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion/ up and strong! > > On 7/8/2015 1:48 AM, tqr2813d376cjozqa...@tutanota.com wrote: >> 4. Jul 2015 22:57 by s...@sky-ip.org <mailto:s...@sky-ip.org>: > >> After little over 3 days of uptime, the OnionBalance hidden >> service http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion >> <http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion/> was successfully accessed over 1 >> Million times. There was no complaint in any of the running Tor >> instance s. > > > >> Hey s7r, things still looking OK? How are the numbers now? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVnS6yAAoJEIC+hZxcLl/kshYP+wf2ka9DzBPHbFOsmpUf+qfK Lx3veq1KKzpgW55dAl8ioUjwMe2+PwNVnopCAXDw96fDDxf4cT4SC4Ac9ZYIKNUO XSTLMeEIazmwYabQDsg79HWfWOucPZOz92awymN5pfNqdE0n5MaiRlTaYxrIbEXE hHwb9uysM1gYiEI1bJs5h5ocrZeW7G475jpXeiPAzLZnXARfkwUXDP+1Zu695zWv vTosEB0nTCk/KVytruFa/RbvX7/BNh+SFBXerQY7+hPDaU6Y4Xhl3M5x+CbNvxnd Yu0qO8ctsQb0KzfcMthaA0NNjEdZBeDn98HbM3tR/x5+6gUj3vIHDJnfWXCn6X4i uvgZtE7Q5VVs0RUuy197ttewJUkFm3G295LxqqSzlj5O9zQ0UXtSMEmX1fx0Bu7u D6kBcGkhfov7TMN9nT3YRK+oW+JW1HlDB7zfJS2tfHUIyuJlqP5RrMhJt1xhZMGb 6LcN0ZccRO7eODdD/gngp28X5BwjLFCaSxUa5m+ZYWHlaaR/PUdHhvqxteu5xNbZ By05wxMaOTyN2LF0yh5FMVqTR45WEp0aKaZE/iyQYQ7HEgm3iNLffI7/YM8LRacO 85o0eN7xfLfjnElspeUPdfP0ulCZT50D8pZLYzsImnqFJ+rduvqD2Y5kl9weKZUB CjcPSBOz4PunrNzY+Vdl =ZU6g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
