-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 >> Again, I really dislike the in-transparency here. > > I agree that it needs improvement. In theory, we already have a > public repository for blacklisting relays: > <https://gitweb.torproject.org/authdirbadexit.git/> > > In practice, nobody has had time yet to put all existing rules in > the new repository.
Yes, it appears empty.. How have they been excluded? (specific IPs, entire IP blocks, fingerprints, ...) >> Why have they been excluded? > > I attached a list of fingerprints that were rejected by the > directory authorities around May 20. list based on your fingerprints: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nusenu/tor-network-observations/master/2015-05-20_102HSDirs_rejected.txt They did not even bother to change IPs, ORport or nicknames. > All these relays were HSDirs and actively scanned hidden services > they were responsible for. What does 'scanned' mean in this context? TCP SYN scans or more tor specific like 'relay early' attacks (something that came up again when I saw they all run tor 0.2.4.x). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVcZK/AAoJEFv7XvVCELh07gUP/jksGszvOhk7yPROr0Org9VS FoP6vxM/Z2U4E3MAT5LqOs6luKWF5Ww9xSUcJf5WILgjRgPEKhueswalLowjDvLE hCXIze6wroHYrAy8lcVKSgfMUESKqJ5B7Z6JEcRWUuKE1cOSBsNae92zNPDvzFht EG8M92V9v2z9gKGX+grrCLGhih50T67Y6CYJQt1tJjZir02dWe5xz7LdCyu7w3l9 SteMyyiI8HkIvcXc80+WhPLI5juq1B17MBceYnVbBkEukIXyVEj8jjE2aNkRflkf TQaKD9WZldchklXi5cngm0dL2+vcP+1g6RKJjO4Rqf5p0Mmv9YPXWdL/wIL6x3lz PgTi4WPBVrmcFRlMe1C+rL/mnEX00MkU6eNHR8wv4quoWE6sJF0F/rKHp+bdev9m kELCY9HeDFvMQckVb21jLxA9Nc7H+7ZzOCWJCFuEyICjrxqliopBPqDUHGjLuTxo RvsQ75BqeZeBOeQtZkAjhWZuS9Xjjeub+5fLhpHBql/xNZy6bd8vrcJnIOzJKbkw n1qcZOXsr+3o+5WNMIB3Ekjo6Qjr6ZwPMT5+jlZ7+N25KVPjMl2rA+VHXjSayYju VSDbx6FRAsFC3avR//KF9Vy42zEb81bPlfnll2l7jgA9+VT/7MisvQjG4zf41wyn TOfOaRArzII5eP95VfTD =2a8z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
