On 5/29/15, grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote: >> On 5/28/15, grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> to be taken other than filling your unused capacity with fill traffic. >>> No network to date appears to be developing or using that defense. >> >> I thought that was the main differentiator for I2P (as compared with >> TOR)?? > > Nope. As above.
Just finished reading a bunch of I2P pages, and can confirm what you say - I'm guessing I read this section, and forgot the "but not yet implemented" bit: "Various mixing strategies at the tunnel level (e.g. create a tunnel that will handle 500 messages / minute, where the endpoint will inject dummy messages if there are insufficient messages, etc) " https://geti2p.net/en/comparison/tor -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
