Is there anything that's wrong about the gpg verification performed on
the version 4.0.4 as seen in the text below?
It's quite different from previous Tor versions. No Erinn Clark.
$ gpg --verify tor-browser-linux32-4.0.4_en-US.tar.xz.asc
gpg: Signature made Wed 25 Feb 2015 02:54:55 AM EST using RSA key ID
F65C2036
gpg: Good signature from "Tor Browser Developers (signing key)
<torbrow...@torproject.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: EF6E 286D DA85 EA2A 4BA7 DE68 4E2C 6E87 9329
8290
Subkey fingerprint: 5242 013F 02AF C851 B1C7 36B8 7017 ADCE F65C
2036
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Does exactly what it says on the tin
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
