Leeroy - I think what he meant was that if anyone can actually get through to someone to talk to (and get a response) - as opposed to breaching a real firewall and leaking staff details, at least that's the way I read it.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:07 PM, l.m <ter.one.lee...@hush.com> wrote: > > "Larry Brandt" wrote: > If anyone can penetrate their personnel firewall, please > disclose to this group. In most on my dealings, CenturyLink was too > under-employed to respond to my requests. > > The problem hasn't even been confirmed as censorship of Tor and you > want to dox them publically using Tor-talk. Is that what you think > Tor-talk is for? Yes of course lets all get right on that for you--so > we can attack their privacy the way they may (or may not) be attacking > their client's? Wrong list. Wrong way of looking at this. > > --leeroy > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- Ben Tasker https://www.bentasker.co.uk -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
