I didn't judge anyone. I specifically said they have the 'alleged' owner. I said good riddance to SR2 and it's ilk. Tor isn't an environment of your freedom. It only ever has the potential to be. You live in a world where your freedom is an ideal that only exists in your head. If it did exist, and Tor were truly net-neutral, then don't ever design around preventing use of specific hosts (like was done for rapidgator). While you're at it make it impossible for guard rotation attacks and make it so exits can neither filter selectively or inspect traffic. Let me setup my internet completely anonymously so no intelligence agency could easily track down my servers. Net neutrality and privacy have overlap but aren't the same thing. Tor project has already made design choices to choose a side--not always for your beloved claim of being an environment of freedom and net-neutrality.
--leeroy bearr On 11/8/2014 at 1:43 PM, "Sam Pizzey" wrote:On 08/11/2014 16:14, l.m wrote: > How's the presence of a > darknet running on Tor hidden services supposed to make me feel > anyway? That's your freedom being used to poison kids and evade > punishment. > On the contrary, it makes me feel that my freedom is being used to provide an environment where some of the damage done by people with your misguided viewpoint can be mitigated. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
