On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 10:15:48AM -0600, Tom Ritter wrote: > On 5 November 2014 03:04, grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Libertas <liber...@mykolab.com> wrote: > >> I think it would be a good idea to add OpenBSD to doc/TUNING because [...] > >> promoting OpenBSD relays benefits the Tor network's security. > > > > Absolutely. Not just due to OpenBSD's security positioning, but > > moreso from network diversity. Windows is its own world. > > I tried installing OpenBSD once... it was tough, heh. > > Coming from a Windows background, I like the idea of running more > nodes on (up-to-date, maintained) Windows servers.
Using Windows + Tor contradicts with the fact of collusion US corporations with US government to commandeer Internet. > > I'll also throw out the obvious that if we're talking about diversity > for the purposes of security, the network-accessible parts of tor rely > on OpenSSL, which would probably be difficult to swap out, but might > be worth it as an experiment. Even if it's to LibreSSL. Maybe the > zlib library also, but that one's had a lot fewer problems than > OpenSSL. If I remember correctly there was commit(s) for libressl support. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
