On 11/03/2014 03:44 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote: > On Saturday 01 November 2014 12:42:41 coderman wrote: >> - support robust stream isolation, beyond what may be default. perhaps >> IsolateDestAddr and IsolateByClientAddr on TransPort (this does not >> yet exist, but you could code it to the benefit of all Transparent >> proxy consumer > > Doesn't this already exist? According to the Tor manual: > > IsolateClientAddr > Don’t share circuits with streams from a different client address. (On by > default and strongly recommended; you can disable it with > NoIsolateClientAddr.) > > IsolateClientProtocol > Don’t share circuits with streams using a different protocol. (SOCKS 4, SOCKS > 5, TransPort connections, NATDPort connections, and DNSPort requests are all > considered to be different protocols.) > > IsolateDestPort > Don’t share circuits with streams targetting a different destination port. > > IsolateDestAddr > Don’t share circuits with streams targetting a different destination address. > > Ah - I just tested it - those two options are not recognized at all. >
Yes they are. But they are options to the SOCKSPort option. I hit the same wall lately… -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
