Sounds like the NSA to me.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:22 AM, <bm-2cuqbqhfvdhuy34zcpl3pngkplueeer...@bitmessage.ch> wrote: > Dear experts, > > Want to clarify some things: > > 1. The fignerprint of a Tor relay which is advertised in the direcotry > data is a SHA1 sum of which key? Sice now a relay has a secret onion key > and a secret key for Ntor. > > 2. The fingerprint (since it's a hash sum of the key) is what strengths > encryption between relays or clients and relays, kind of like a CA in SSL? > That is why the directory authorities sign the list of fingereprints - is > this correct? > > 3. How strong is Ntor compared to TAP? As I can see in latest Tor version > now clients prefer Ntor by default - are there any plans to deprecate TAP > in teh future? > > 4. The fingerprint is a SHA1 hash, as described in the papers. Any plans > to move in the immediate future to a stronger hash algorithm, like SHA256? > > > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
