On 10/28/14, s7r <s...@sky-ip.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Seth, > > Totally agree about undermining decentralization by having to trust a > single provider. Nobody recommended that, the addresses were for > informative purpose only, to be used in parallel with other nodes run > by other operators / organizations. No user is forced to use > exclusively peers run by the same operator. An user is free to add as > many hidden nodes for bootstrapping as desired. Once connected to a > node that node will exchange information about other nodes and so on. > > I agree the hidden services are old. There is a nice proposal, > hopefully it will be analyzed more and implemented as soon as possible.
Do you have a link to what you are thinking of? What comes to my mind just now is DJB's black box (i.e. "make it simple for the developer to do the right thing"): http://nacl.cr.yp.to/ http://rdist.root.org/2009/07/14/nacl-djbs-new-crypto-library/ -- Banned for life from Debian, for suggesting Debian's CoC is being swung in our faces a little too vigorously. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
