On 01/12/2013 10:06 PM, and...@torproject.is wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 09:36:10AM +0100, r...@zenger.nl wrote 3.1K bytes in > 0 lines about: > : This is not the same. Roger's e-mail is on the efforts of the Dutch > : police, I was mentioning efforts of the Dutch secret services. The Dutch > : secret services are all about national security, not about sexual abuse > : of childeren. > > Ok. Fine clarification indeed. >
hi. if someone want to pick up on this thread, the nsa notes from that meeting with dutch intel can now be found here: http://cryptome.org/2013/11/nsa-dutch-sigint.pdf [3 pages, short discussion of TOR starts at the bottom of p.2]. 7 lines are censored by the newspaper, reportedly upon the request of the dutch intelligence agency. after that, it reads 'they [dutch intel] are looking at marrying up the forum data with other social network info, and trying to figure out good ways to mine the data that they have'. there's a number of theories circulating about what has been censored, and why. any thoughts? - 2013/14 Fellow Berkman Center (Harvard) & CITP (Princeton) http://www.ivir.nl/staff/arnbak.html https://twitter.com/axelarnbak PGP 0x31FBA62B -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
