Hi, This is a bit OT, but it might be of interest here, too.
I don't know whether you follow the GnuPG mailing lists, but in case you missed it: there has been a dispute between Richard Stallman and Werner Koch on a license change for the GNU Privacy Handbook (GPH). > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gnupg/doc/63276?page=last I don't know them personally, but usually their wording in the mailing lists is much more balanced; however in this case, there's been things said that make me very concerned about the future of GnuPG, like > Werner: > I have always spoken out in favor of the GNU project - maybe now is > the time to reconsider. Currently it seems that the discussion has stopped without solution (or maybe the "solution" to rewrite the documentation from scratch. IMHO not a real solution). To me, GnuPG is a key infrastructure component (same as Tor and the GNU Project) and it makes me concerned, that RMS and WK seem to have a personal conflict (as the arguments very quickly rose to a personal level). What do you think on that situation? Is there a possibility to bring them back to the round table, or otherwise solve the problem? I don't want to post this on the GnuPG list, as it could look like voting for one side. Maybe, what I want to achieve is that people who are in closer contact with RMS/WK know about the issue and talk to them. Of course I didn't ask RMS nor WK whether they would accept (or need) a third party to mediate. Both sides have reasonable arguments for their positions and personally, I don't feel authorized enough to vote for one side. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk