It will not be a fork. Anything I do will be submitted for inclusion in the main branch when ready.
Quite a number of the changes I mentioned are in the pipeline anyway. Mark McCarron -------- Original Message -------- From: Red Sonja <bm-2ctpedtadjx2bqf6wuux1cper78sq3x...@bitmessage.ch> Sent: Tue Nov 19 19:07:31 GMT+00:00 2013 To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New TOR Service Suggestions and Enhancements Mark McCarron: > It is my view TOR is currently compromised by intelligence agencies > sharing information on TOR traffic. These modifications must be made > and rolled out ASAP. So it's pointless to continue using Tor or any related tech. You «ASAP» mods are going to be broken even faster. >> Have you read *IBM and the Holocaust*? > > No, I will look it up. I was hoping for «reading» instead of just look it up. But it's up to you. > I'm examining this as a possibility but I am tied up until the august > at least. I have the necessary skills to deliver such a solution. > It looks like most of what I am saying is being worked on in > different ways and we just need to bring that together and roll it > out. I guess the whole list will welcome you with your fork. It would be harder with getting the qualified eyes for peer review, tho. Cheers! -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
