Basically it is a complicated way to configure Tor to be a point of entry for a VPN Server. Why not just configure PPTPD then connect to it via Tor? On Aug 23, 2013 9:35 AM, "Sebastian G. <bastik.tor>" < bastik....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 23.08.2013 03:22, Andrew Lewman: > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:20:52 -0400 > > grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> There are no official "exit bridges" provided as part of Tor > >>> network. However you could setup your traffic to go through Tor to > >>> a regular VPN or proxy service and then exit to the destination you > >>> want. > >> > >> - This exit bridges is interesting idea. > > > > I know of a few orgs which run an exit relay, but set > > "PublishServerDescriptor 0" option so only their social graph knows of > > the exit relay. I forget how they force their exit relay when they need > > it, but I've seen it work and the orgs are happy with their solution. > > > > How is it possible to use a publicly unknown exit, which should have no > exit flag, not appear in the consensus and therefore should not be used > by unmodified clients? > > (I'm assuming that a client would only use exits if they are exits in > the consensus.) > > Well, a bridge with an exit-policy won't be used as exit, even if > SingleHop is allowed. Or am I wrong? > > (I remember that this is the case, since a bridge would see what a > client uses Tor for and is not bound by the Guard implementation) > > Regards, > Sebastian G. > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
