On Mon, 01 Jul 2013 22:18:06 +0000, coderman wrote: ... > you should assume this number will always approach anything greater > than zero; and how do you handle a reduction? axe clients without > prejudice?
Put new clients into the next instance of this service, formally operated by someone else? > better option: end-to-end only, usable privacy that is secure by > default - the only mode is secure. then you can publish "lawful > intercepts" of ciphertext without risk to any users.** Lawful intercepts also include the access metadata (which I assume to be equally secure here), and access to the emails themselves. While encrypted the service still has to know source and destination to some extent. Also, LI interception is a cost factor. > if you're forced to cooperate with active malware explotation of > customers through assisted MitM via your services it is time to pull > the plug and announce while you find a sane jurisdiction. I guess under NSLs this could be construed as publishing same, so the NSL effectively forces you to stay in business. Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800 _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
