On 4/20/13 11:34 AM, Asa Rossoff wrote: > The onionoo link confirms my bridge is known to exist..was beginning to > worry :) (I know, patience) > > However, shouldn't there be a flag indicating obfs2 and obfs3 ports or > something? Ports are open and I can telnet to their garbled text from > outside.
Good point. We scrub TCP ports before publishing bridge descriptors, but Onionoo could at least report supported transport names in its docs. I just opened #8747 for this. Thanks. > Also, how important is it for a bridge to maintain the same IP address over > the long term? I'd say a stable address is important for a bridge. Bridge clients cannot compensate bridge address changes manually, so the bridge user would have to go find a new bridge. Of course, if you don't have a stable address around, running a bridge on a changing address is better than running no bridge at all. Thanks, Karsten _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
