On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:38:34 +0000 adrelanos <adrela...@riseup.net> wrote:
> Outlaw: > > Hi! Let`s say main linux user A is cut off from Internet with iptables, > > user B starts Tor. If I run TorBrowser by user A, connect it to Tor > > (which is started by B) with socks and turn on flash plugin, is there > > any security/anonimity leak in this scheme? Thank you. > > If you ever use or used Flash without Tor, your Tor session can likely > be linked to your non-Tor session. (Flash Cookies, browser fingerprint, > fonts, os, kernel, dpi, etc.) > > I believe my project Whonix is currently the safest method to use Flash. > IP/DNS/location remains safe, but Flash usage will always be only > pseudonymous rather than anonymous. Linking your sessions will be > limited to your activity inside the Workstation. Details: whonix is nice, but heavier on system with virtual box. Where a system wide tor enforcement is a good alternative. It is possible with iptables. We might think about a service, when start do system wide tor enforcement, when stop revert back the system to normal mode. Though I am not successful yet to exclude the lan from this enforcement, as I need to access some local IP directly. I need some more understanding with iptables. Can anyone help me with the iptables please ? Thanks _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
