Ted Smith: >> So far you didn't say anything useful or non-obvious, so why did you >> post? You didn't like someone's written experience, so he is >> automatically a troll or a false flag — fine, bring your own >> references. > > I don't have to "bring my own references" to point out that the only > *actually existing* "statistical" evaluation of illegal content on Tor, > that provides the cornerstone of your argument that "The Tor Project is > misleading the public about the use cases of Tor," is totally baseless. > You have no explanation for how that person reached that conclusion. > > I am posting because I think your attitude that Tor is entirely used for > CP and other illegal content is baseless. It's based on a flawed > methodology (and in most cases, no methodology). I would like you to > strengthen your evidence, and if you manage to produce something > convincing, I'd agree with it.
I would also speculate that Tor has a lot (from western view, not Chinese government view) legitimate users. Many popular websites are blocked in China and other countries, people use Tor for circumvention. That will have a good impact on statistics. _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
