>I'm confused. Did you mean that you can't get to the anonbib webpage? >The link you gave is the same as the one given on the anonbib page. >(I gave the anonbib location to point people at a place where they >might see lots of related papers by others and also to give in one >location citation two possible URLs to retrieve the paper, the one you >gave plus the anonbib cached version. Both of these worked for me >when I tried them a moment ago.)
Just tried it again and it is working for me now. Originally, I would get a blank page (no 404, etc.). Don't know what was going on with that. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Paul Syverson <syver...@itd.nrl.navy.mil>wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:52:34AM +0000, b.g. white wrote: > > >We did do a design that, if one had a scheme that was successful > > >against a passive attacker, would resist an active attacker. Though > > >providing provable guarantees against a class of active attacker, it > > >is not ready for primetime. See "Preventing Active Timing Attacks in > > >Low-Latency Anonymous Communication" at http://freehaven.net/anonbib/ > > > > That link to the paper is dead (for me?). Here is a good one. > > http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/jf/FJS-PETS2010.pdf > > > > I'm confused. Did you mean that you can't get to the anonbib webpage? > The link you gave is the same as the one given on the anonbib page. > (I gave the anonbib location to point people at a place where they > might see lots of related papers by others and also to give in one > location citation two possible URLs to retrieve the paper, the one you > gave plus the anonbib cached version. Both of these worked for me > when I tried them a moment ago.) > > HTH, > Paul > _______________________________________________ > tor-talk mailing list > tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
