On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:36:45 +0000, Robert Ransom wrote: ... > Which languages do you want us to ship a dictionary for in every Tor > client? (Please specify the exact dictionaries you want us to use as > well.)
Left as an exercise for later. > How large are these dictionaries (in bytes)? The last one I tried is 16655 words, 91445 bytes (null-terminated strings). ... > Have you tried this using the actual dictionaries that you want us to > use? Are the resulting addresses really memorable? goric-edema-Alces-rune-pan-coost feign-crig-plane-tret-balli-chela => Slightly. (I admit that I did not look up what base the *.onion names are in, so the number of bits and thus words may be off.) > How long are the > resulting addresses? Longer, of course. > Can they be entered into a computer as > efficiently as addresses in the current format? Depends on the meaning of 'efficient'. Being longer it's more obvious work to type, but... > Can a human proofread > addresses in this form for errors as efficiently as addresses in the > current format? ...easier to proofread or spell over the phone. But then, the proofread part may be eased by adding a few minus signs into the usual onion names just as well. That said, the real problem is deployment of anything like this. Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800 _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
