On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:36 -0700, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote: > On Wednesday 1 June, 2011 18:41:47 Marsh Ray wrote: > > > - VirtualBox VM bridged to LAN still must share the LAN class C, and > > > could potentially monitor internal traffic. (And please don't > > > quibble with me calling it a class C... they have to make up a name > > > and stick with it. I still call Nissan's a Datsun) > > > > No, you're factually wrong on the deeper point. The muddy terminology is > > just a symptom. > > Yeah that's a big help. I can take that to the bank! > > Look, I'm a real estate developer, not a coder. OK? > > When I have something I can work with I'll consider a relay, but as long > as everyone is coy about security, you will have trouble recruiting > relays. That's a fact, deal with it. >
They had no trouble recruiting me and I don't even know what a 'VirtualBox brideged to a LAN' is. Lots of people trust Tor to work and be secure. No coyness required. GD -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different... _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
