tor-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [tor-dev] So Windows is Adding a Package Manager..... Keifer Bly
  • Re: [tor-dev] So Windows is Adding a Package Manager..... Damian Johnson
• [tor-dev] tor-dev Digest, Vol 112, Issue 21 Support Team
• [tor-dev] Moving key material out of the main tor process Linus Nordberg
  • Re: [tor-dev] Moving key material out of the main tor process David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] Moving key material out of the main tor process Linus Nordberg
  • Re: [tor-dev] Moving key material out of the main tor process Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Moving key material out of the main tor process Linus Nordberg
• [tor-dev] Deprecating Tor Protocol Versions teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Deprecating Tor Protocol Versions David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] Deprecating Tor Protocol Versions teor
• [tor-dev] woswos - GSoC 2020 Barkin Simsek
• [tor-dev] Walking onions: week 10 update Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services Ian Goldberg
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services Paul Syverson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services Sebastian Hahn
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 320: Removing TAP usage from v2 onion services s7r
• [tor-dev] Proposal 319: RELAY_FRAGMENT cells Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 319: RELAY_FRAGMENT cells teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 319: RELAY_FRAGMENT cells David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 319: RELAY_FRAGMENT cells Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Proposal 318: Limit protover values to 0-63 Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 318: Limit protover values to 0-63 teor
• [tor-dev] Is anybody using OnionPerf's measurement results in the .tpf format? Karsten Loesing
• [tor-dev] Tor Network Expansion Question/Suggestion Beecher Bruno
• [tor-dev] My Introduction_GSoC Student Hashik Donthineni
• [tor-dev] Example of how a stream of RELAY_DATA cells would work? Eli Vakrat
  • Re: [tor-dev] Example of how a stream of RELAY_DATA cells would work? Roger Dingledine
• [tor-dev] (No walking onions update for last week) Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Fwd: Orbot 16.2.0 RC-1 (tor-0.4.2.7) Nathan Freitas
• [tor-dev] Proposal Idea: IPv6-Only Exit Relays teor
• [tor-dev] Tor Relay wont connect to private IP address Eli Vakrat
  • Re: [tor-dev] Tor Relay wont connect to private IP address teor
• [tor-dev] Relay Truncated Cell Example Eli Vakrat
  • Re: [tor-dev] Relay Truncated Cell Example teor
• [tor-dev] Walking onions status update: week 8 Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation nusenu
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation nusenu
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Roger Dingledine
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation nusenu
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation nusenu
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Alexander Færøy
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Jeremy Rand
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Alexander Færøy
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Jeremy Rand
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Alexander Færøy
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Jeremy Rand
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation nusenu
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation nusenu
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation nusenu
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation nusenu
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation Christian Hofer
  • Re: [tor-dev] Support for full DNS resolution and DNSSEC validation nusenu
• [tor-dev] Proposal XXX: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal) Matt Traudt
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal XXX: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal) Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal XXX: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal) teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 316: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal) Matt Traudt
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 316: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal) teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal XXX: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal) Mike Perry
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal XXX: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal) teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 316: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal) Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 316: FlashFlow: A Secure Speed Test for Tor (Parent Proposal) Matt Traudt
• [tor-dev] Proposal 314: Allow Markdown for proposal format. Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Proposal 315: Updating the list of fields required in directory documents Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 315: Updating the list of fields required in directory documents teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 315: Updating the list of fields required in directory documents Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Building a privacy-preserving "contact tracing" app Adrien Luxey
  • Re: [tor-dev] Building a privacy-preserving "contact tracing" app teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Building a privacy-preserving "contact tracing" app Jeff Burdges
  • Re: [tor-dev] Building a privacy-preserving "contact tracing" app carlo von lynX
• [tor-dev] Fallback Directory Handover teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Fallback Directory Handover Ian Goldberg
  • Re: [tor-dev] Fallback Directory Handover teor
• [tor-dev] Walking Onions: week 7 update Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring c
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring meejah
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring c
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring c
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring meejah
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring c
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring c
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring c
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney code refactoring c
• [tor-dev] Choosing a valid Circuit ID for an OR connection Eli Vakrat
  • Re: [tor-dev] Choosing a valid Circuit ID for an OR connection Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Walking onions status update: week 6 notes Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Does a design document for the DoS subsystem exist? Lennart Oldenburg
  • Re: [tor-dev] Does a design document for the DoS subsystem exist? George Kadianakis
  • Re: [tor-dev] Does a design document for the DoS subsystem exist? Lennart Oldenburg
  • Re: [tor-dev] Does a design document for the DoS subsystem exist? David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] Does a design document for the DoS subsystem exist? Lennart Oldenburg
• [tor-dev] Walking onions status update: week 5 notes Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits George Kadianakis
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits Mike Perry
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits Mike Perry
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits George Kadianakis
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits Mike Perry
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits yoehoduv
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits yoehoduv
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits yoehoduv
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits George Kadianakis
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits George Kadianakis
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits George Kadianakis
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits George Kadianakis
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits Jim Newsome
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits tevador
  • Re: [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits David Goulet
  • [tor-dev] [RFC] Proposal: A First Take at PoW Over Introduction Circuits johnymnx
• [tor-dev] txtorcon 20.0.0 meejah
• [tor-dev] Walking onions status update: week 4 notes Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking onions status update: week 4 notes teor
• [tor-dev] Chutney tests fail for tor/maint-0.3.5 (bug #33677) c
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney tests fail for tor/maint-0.3.5 (bug #33677) teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney tests fail for tor/maint-0.3.5 (bug #33677) c
  • Re: [tor-dev] Chutney tests fail for tor/maint-0.3.5 (bug #33677) teor
• [tor-dev] Improving onion service availability during DoS using anonymous credentials George Kadianakis
  • Re: [tor-dev] Improving onion service availability during DoS using anonymous credentials Jeff Burdges
  • Re: [tor-dev] Improving onion service availability during DoS using anonymous credentials George Kadianakis
• Re: [tor-dev] GSOC'20 Sanjiban Sengupta
  • Re: [tor-dev] GSOC'20 Pili Guerra
• [tor-dev] Walking onions status update: week 3 notes Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking onions status update: week 3 notes teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking onions status update: week 3 notes Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking onions status update: week 3 notes teor
• [tor-dev] Tails vs the capacity of the Meek bridges anonym
  • Re: [tor-dev] [Tails-dev] Tails vs the capacity of the Meek bridges sajolida
  • Re: [tor-dev] [Tails-dev] Tails vs the capacity of the Meek bridges Iain Learmonth
  • Re: [tor-dev] [Tails-dev] Tails vs the capacity of the Meek bridges anonym
  • Re: [tor-dev] Tails vs the capacity of the Meek bridges David Fifield
  • Re: [tor-dev] Tails vs the capacity of the Meek bridges anonym
• [tor-dev] Auto close old tor GitHub pull requests? teor
• [tor-dev] Request to provide code for Padding in Tor DIVYA GUPTA
  • Re: [tor-dev] Request to provide code for Padding in Tor Ryan Duff
• [tor-dev] Fwd: Upcoming Tor security releases to fix a denial-of-service issue Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Walking Onions status update: week 2 notes Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking Onions status update: week 2 notes teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking Onions status update: week 2 notes teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking Onions status update: week 2 notes Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking Onions status update: week 2 notes teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking Onions status update: week 2 notes Nick Mathewson
  • Re: [tor-dev] Walking Onions status update: week 2 notes Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] SOOC (Same Origin Onion Certificates) discussion tomorrow Richard Pospesel
  • Re: [tor-dev] SOOC (Same Origin Onion Certificates) discussion tomorrow d...@foundingdocuments.org
• [tor-dev] Walking Onions status update: week 1 notes Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] Regarding GSoC 2020 Aman Rastogi
  • Re: [tor-dev] Regarding GSoC 2020 Pili Guerra
• [tor-dev] interested in working on a ticket indigo omega
  • Re: [tor-dev] interested in working on a ticket teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] interested in working on a ticket grarpamp
• [tor-dev] tor sending requests with a token Pouya Miralaee
• [tor-dev] TOR Browser Circuit Selection of Exit Nodes Vianney Gomezgil Yaspik
  • Re: [tor-dev] TOR Browser Circuit Selection of Exit Nodes nusenu
  • Re: [tor-dev] TOR Browser Circuit Selection of Exit Nodes teor
• [tor-dev] Making Tor's CI Faster teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Making Tor's CI Faster Hans-Christoph Steiner
• [tor-dev] Proposal 313: Relay IPv6 Statistics teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 313: Relay IPv6 Statistics Karsten Loesing
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 313: Relay IPv6 Statistics teor
  • Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 313: Relay IPv6 Statistics Nick Mathewson
• [tor-dev] CVE-2020-8516 Hidden Service deanonymization juanjo
  • Re: [tor-dev] CVE-2020-8516 Hidden Service deanonymization David Goulet
  • Re: [tor-dev] CVE-2020-8516 Hidden Service deanonymization Paul Syverson
  • Re: [tor-dev] CVE-2020-8516 Hidden Service deanonymization Mike Perry

• Earlier messages
• Later messages