George Kadianakis <desnac...@riseup.net> writes: > However, IMO the right way to do this feature, would be to improve the control > port code and design so that it doesn't get so overwhelmed by multiple > events. That said, I'm not sure exactly what kind of changes we would have to > do to the control port to actually make it a viable option, and it seems to me > like a pretty big project that serves as a medium-term to long-term solution > (which we have no resources to pursue right now), whereas the hack of this > thread is more of a short-term solution.
Is it definitely the Tor-side control-port code that's "overwhelmed", or is the controller-side not reading fast enough or something..? (It seems odd to me that it's somehow faster/better to inband-signal via HTTP..) What controller is being used? -- meejah _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
