Hi,

Thank you!  I've added this as proposal 308.  I'll be looking it over
> with interest in the near future.
>

Thanks for adding this to the list of proposals.


> One thing that helps me understand this kind of proposal is writing or
> examining a reference implementation for it, so I can see clearly what
> state is kept, which party does what, and so on.  I did one for
> proposal 295 as https://github.com/nmathewson/prop295ref -- I hope I
> can get a reference implementation together for this one too, unless
> you're already on it.
>

A reference implementation would be nice and at the moment we are
not working on that.

It would also be interesting to know what the ADL authors think of
> this proposal too -- most of us at Tor aren't cryptographers
> ourselves.
>

Of course, all input is welcome.

Best wishes,

Jean Paul
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Reply via email to