Hi, Thank you! I've added this as proposal 308. I'll be looking it over > with interest in the near future. >
Thanks for adding this to the list of proposals. > One thing that helps me understand this kind of proposal is writing or > examining a reference implementation for it, so I can see clearly what > state is kept, which party does what, and so on. I did one for > proposal 295 as https://github.com/nmathewson/prop295ref -- I hope I > can get a reference implementation together for this one too, unless > you're already on it. > A reference implementation would be nice and at the moment we are not working on that. It would also be interesting to know what the ADL authors think of > this proposal too -- most of us at Tor aren't cryptographers > ourselves. > Of course, all input is welcome. Best wishes, Jean Paul
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev