Hi David, > On 15 Aug 2019, at 22:56, David Goulet <dgou...@torproject.org> wrote: > > I'm leaning towards not closing the circuit and falling back on the consensus > parameters.
Using the consensus parameters seems like a good thing to do. We can say "valid parameters override the consensus parameters. Invalid parameters are ignored, and the circuit uses the consensus parameters." > And at some point in time, we'll be able to implement the > INTRO_ESTABLISHED response. In the meantime, there is little chances that tor > vanilla start sending bad values since they are validated from the torrc file. Do we have a protocol warning for invalid parameters? If we do, we should be able to detect issues as they happen. I don't think there's an easy way of detecting these kinds of bugs in chutney. But maybe we want to set consensus parameters and torrc parameters on one of the chutney networks? T _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
