Hi Neel, > On 30 Jul 2019, at 03:11, Neel Chauhan <n...@neelc.org> wrote: > > Just a reminder that this proposal (Prop306) needs to be reviewed: > https://github.com/torproject/torspec/pull/87
I can't find these changes that I requested to the proposal: >> On 14 Jul 2019, at 02:47, teor <t...@riseup.net> wrote: >> >> I have some overall comments on the proposal: >> >> 1. The proposal is very large now. Let's add an intro section that splits >> the changes into: These parts of the proposal exist, but they are not in separate sections: >> * initial feasability testing (for initial developer review) >> * minimum viable product (for testing in Tor Browser Alpha) >> * parameter tuning (for performance, load, and user experience) >> * optional features, and how we will know if we need them (if users >> experience particular bugs) These parts of the proposal do not exist: >> * relay statistics (for ongoing monitoring) This modification is not in the current proposal: >> 2. Bridges can't be configured with an IPv4 and an IPv6 address in tor, >> because tor only accepts one IP address per bridge. Let's be clear that >> bridges are out of scope. (Tor already attempts to connect to all? its >> configured bridges.) I added some suggest text to make bridges out of scope for this proposal. I don't see any deleted text: >> 3. Each revision of this proposal has added text. Is there any text that is >> redundant or not essential? Can we make it shorter? David suggested we delete one section, and I suggested we keep some of it, but delete most of it. I also suggested we move some alternative options to an appendix. Is there anything else you think we can delete? T
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
