Hi, > On 17 Mar 2019, at 08:04, Ryan Duff <r...@nduff.com> wrote: > >> The way we intended to do this was to send our FF "ground-truth" >> collection through Tor, and specifically through the same exit node as >> TTB uses. This way we can isolate the variable to the differences in the >> browsers, rather than any network or other concerns. In addition, we are >> working on developing a method for determining if content is dynamically >> generated (and therefore different every time), or broken. > > Won't this severely taint your "ground-truth" though? If you're ultimately > using the exit-node for both, then you'll really only end up measuring what > is friendly to the Tor Browser itself instead of Tor overall. Is that the > goal? > > If not, with direct access to an exit node, you could run the test direct > from that node (not using Tor) for the "ground truth" and then use it as the > exit node of choice for the Tor Browser to have a solid comparison between > Tor vs Not-Tor.
Most sites block by IP (or IP range), so a direct connection using the exit node's IP should give you very similar results to a Tor circuit using the exit node's IP. T
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
