> with the exact same > restrictions and semantics as the Location HTTP header
Maybe that should be 'syntax'? Semantics would mean that the header behaves the same way right? But it doesn't. Location is a prompt-less redirect, O-L is a prompted redirect. Additionally, O-L has an additional restriction that the URI specified must be .onion? > websites with lots of client traffic are encouraged Why do we need to encourage them? Aren't they sufficiently motivated themselves? I would go so far as to suggest they do _not_ do that, because there is no fully reliable detection mechanism. But if they want to, we 'can provide suggestions for them'? And perhaps one suggestion is to detect User-Agent and only serve it to one of the five user-agents that support Tor? (Since we discourage anything else?) (TB, TBA, Brave, Orfox, OnionBrowser) -tom _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
