On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:58 PM, ng0 <n...@infotropique.org> wrote: > Hi, > > our plan with the bibliography collection of GNUnet is to > implement something similar to your/freehaven's anonbib. > > While running the build and cache update of it from > current git HEAD on the anonbib.cfg I noticed a number of > outdated and broken links. > > I'm currently playing with 2 options: re-use anonbib as it is > and change the style + some of its content (for us at GNUnet) > or write something similar to it. > From my perspective option 1 would be the best as we could > work on fixing links together, keep the content up-to-date > and at the same time keep the duplicate efforts and work > down to a minimum. > > What do you think?
Hi! I'd love to have more people working on the anonbib content. The code itself is an old yucky kludge to which I feel no strong attachment, and the generated HTML is also in need of a revamp. So, "patches welcome"! -- Nick
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
