Delete my accountf On Apr 1, 2017 9:45 AM, "Felipe Dau" <d...@riseup.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 02:48:45AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > > It's suggested and welcome that all overlay networks publicly > > review, audit, analyze, each others work and offerings. Unfortunately > > that hasn't develop much yet in a formal dedicated as responsibility > > manner among even the larger opensource community, or even > > discussion if that is a good idea. (But there is some good work in > > some projects out there lately of their own work... automated code > > linting, and the rarer procured third party audit.) > > > > Then shall we presume all our networks are equivalently secure?, > > or equivalently flawed, as each network happens to advertise now and > then. > > Makes sense. > > > This may leave the matter of partitioning up to the user to consider > > pursuant to any note about that in the app documentation. > > I agree. Giving power of choice to the users is ideal. > > > The app could enable simultaneous multihome based on commandline > > options... --tor --i2p --cjdns --other, default [whatever] . > > And of course all the ports / addresses / bindings would need to > > be flexible. > > > > On equivalent networks, presence is maybe a bigger issue than > partitioning. > > This includes concept to drop the network identity off the network > itself, > > or use new ID, not just managing announces to buddy list entries. > > Interesting! I opened an issue [0] to discuss this feature (copied > your post there). It might take a while to work on that as we have > other tasks with a higher priority, but I intend to get back to it at > some point. > > Thanks, > -Felipe > > _______________________________________________ > tor-dev mailing list > tor-dev@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev > >
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
