Hi Yawning. Thank you for providing these links. This is very helpful. I will make sure that these issues are discussed at the next specification meeting.
On Mar 28, 2017 8:36 AM, "Yawning Angel" <yawn...@schwanenlied.me> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:03:47 -0500 > Brandon Wiley <bran...@blanu.net> wrote: > > I am familiar with the dual stack problem generally, where servers > > have both IPv4 and IPv6 IP addresses. I was not involved in any > > conversations regarding the dual stack problem for Pluggable > > Transports specifically. If you could point me to any documentation > > on this issue, that would be helpful. Alternatively, if you could > > explain what the issue is and what possible solutions you'd like to > > see in a future Pluggable Transports specification, that is something > > we could make happen in future specifications revisions. > > None of the things I've mentioned are new concerns, and I brought all > of them up (and more) a long time ago back when I was giving thought > to the PT spec. > > I've basically given up at this point, and to be honest I gave up > shortly after I initially started making noises about improving the > spec because it was clear that while I was trying to improve the > existing interface while preserving the overall architecture, everyone > else was far more interested in "lets make everything into a bunch of > library code". > > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-September/009432.html > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21261 > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/11211 > > Regards, > > -- > Yawning Angel > > _______________________________________________ > tor-dev mailing list > tor-dev@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev > >
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
