On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:39 PM, David Fifield <da...@bamsoftware.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:58:55PM +0100, Massimo La Morgia wrote: > > we are a research group at Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. We do > research on > > distributed systems, Tor, and the Dark Web. As part of our work, we have > > developed OnionGatherer, a service that gives up-to-date information > about Dark > > Web hidden services to Tor users. > > ...and presumably helps you build a crowdsourced list of onion services > that you plan to use for some other research purpose? > yes, of course in this way we are building a crowdsourced list of onion services, but is not really different from onion directories. At this time we have no plan for other research that use this crowdsourced list. > > If you're planning a research project on Tor users, you should write to > the research safety board and get ideas about how ot do it in a way that > minimizes risk. > https://research.torproject.org/safetyboard.html > > thank you for the suggestion. > This idea seems, to me, to have a lot of privacy problems. You're asking > people to use Chrome instead of Tor Browser, which means they will be > vulnerable to a lot of fingerprinting and trivial deanonymization > attacks. No we are not asking people to use chrome for browsing on tor, but we are offering a service that can help them to know if a onion address is up before start to surf with Tor Browser > Your extension reports not only the onion domains that it > finds, but also the URL of the page you were browsing at the time: > var onionsJson = JSON.stringify({onions:onions, website: > window.location.href}); > You need to at least inform your research subjects/users what of their > private data you are storing and what you are doing with it. > As you can see from the source code we are not storing any sensitive data like ip or users information. do you think that only URL page can damage user privacy? > You're using two different regexes for onion URLs that aren't the same. > The one used during replacement doesn't match "https", so I guess it > will fail on URLs like https://facebookcorewwwi.onion/. > /^(http(s)?:\/\/)?.{16}(\.onion)\/?.*$/ > /(http:\/\/)?\b[\w\d]{16}\.onion(\/[\S]*|)/ > Yes, you right, thank you for the feedback.
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev